Against Universality | The Great Dissent
Trapezium in M42, The Orion Nebula
I am a child of earth and starry heaven,
But my origins are in heaven alone.
You yourselves know this.
– The Petelia Amulet
In the Dakini Weather Watch for March 25, 2019 (Jupiter Loop: The Vine of Eternal Youth), posted exclusively to staff members in 18 Breaking Nous, I opened a vein of discourse which, upon reviewing it now, three months later, strikes me as absolutely core to the principles and practice of Planetary Tantra. That being so, I am making this talk and text on “The Great Dissent” free to all guests on the campus. It includes a reprise of the main points of the March DWW report, and then some further elucidation.
Bear in mind from the get-go that I consider this topic to address the most imperative issues for Correction that I have so far presented in the entire range of my writings, solo talks, and interviews. That issue is universality, the generic human, or the concept of humanity as you encounter it in the universalist doctrine of Christianity. It extends as well to the new age cliche, we are one, we are all one people, etc. What I mean by the Great Dissent is the challenge to oppose and overthrow this conception of humanity, and not just argumentatively, but in a living demonstration, witnessing to humanity by a different standard.
Here is a quotation from mainstream media featuring a discussion of acts committed by M13 gang members from Mexico. The closing statement is from Nancy Pelosi:
The clip is 6 minutes long and worth watching in its entirety. I will discuss two issues that come up in the rhetoric used here: calling human beings animals, and appealing to the spark of divinity, presumed to be the basis for assuming “the dignity and worth of every person.”
If you believe in the dignity and worth of every person, you adhere to the universalist concept of humanity. And if not… What then?
Great Dissent Audio:
Spark of Divinity
Way back whenever, I contributed a piece on Gnosticism to Wikipedia. It was deleted and not long afterword the entry on me was deleted. The editor responsible gave as his reason: In the body of my writings and talks, I had not contributed anything significant enough to merit serious attention.
In the suppressed Wikipedia passage on Gnosticism, I did as I have often been required to do as a scholar treating the evidence: namely, I explained that the widely held view of Gnosticism is a straw man argument drawn from the hateful and erroneous views of those who opposed the Gnostics and sought to destroy the Mysteries. Although my efforts do not merit attention, I do stand as the single Gnostic scholar who has restored the worldview actually held by Gnostics, stating it on their terms. The defamatory view asserts that Gnostics despised the material world and held it to be the work of the Demiurge, an inferior demented god whom they identified with the Judeo-Christian creator, Yahweh-Jehovah.
The last phrase is a partial truth: Gnostics identified the Judaeo-Christian “Father God” as a demented and hostile alien entity. Yes, but they specified that entity, whom they called Ialdabaoth, to be a pretender, a fake, incapable of an original creative act. Ialdabaoth did not and could not create the manifest universe or any part of it. The telestai who founded and led the Mysteries distinguished between the kosmos, a system of falsity and delusion comparable to “the matrix” of current-day conception, and kaz, the Coptic variant of the Greek ge, “earth.” The Abrahamic creator is a fraud who runs a system of deceit. Yahweh did not create the earth. How could Gnostics who saw the earth as the immanent form of the wisdom goddess Sophia, the central figure in their cosmology, have detested the material world? What they exposed and opposed is the archontic matrix, “the system” or field of deceit that works upon the human mind as a psychological warfare program directed by alien forces.
Additional to the two points I have refuted as wrongly attributed to the Gnostic worldview — that the material world is the creation of the Demiurge and as such, must be condemned and rejected — there is a third issue concerning “the spark of divinity.” This concept follows as a conclusion from the previous two: due to the fact that the world is the product of an evil being and must be rejected, spiritual development consists in liberating the spark of divinity inherent to all human beings from imprisonment in material darkness.
In fact, the liberation of the spark of divinity is a prominent concept in Cabala. Indeed, it is central to the Jewish concept of world correction, tikkun olam. It is not, however, a genuine Gnostic concept. (See note on The Hymn of the Pearl at the end of this text.)
Significantly, a search for “divine spark” spotlights this image from Chabad.org, a website promoting the Cabalistic theology of Chabad Lubavitch, the elite corps of Talmudic ideology.
To see what is wrong with the spark of divinity meme, all you have to do is look closely as the Gnostic concept of the Anthropos. Gnostic scholars who are worthy of attention and, unlike myself, merit inclusion in Wikipedia, all concur in a routine way to handle this term: they refer to “the Anthropos doctrine,” without defining exactly what it is. Loosely considered, the Anthropos doctrine is a catch-all term for any and all references scattered through the rubble of Gnostic texts that suggest a narrative of anthropogenesis: the story of the human species. The experts erroneously call this material “a doctrine,” as if it were some kind of abstract formulation, but it is in reality a description of an event.
M 42 Orion Nebula
As recounted in the FGS, the Fallen Goddess Scenario, the design and material construction of the Anthropos was accomplished in the Pleroma, the galactic core, by the collaboration of two Aeons, Sophia and Thelete. Everything is material. Sophia and Thelete designed and constructed the Anthropos (read: human genome) on the substantial basis of nucleic acid existing in a fluidic medium, calibrating it with seven specific properties. The sacred narrative describes how the Aeons in their totality projected the genomic plasm beyond the boundary of the Pleroma into the Kenoma, the external limbs of the galaxy, so that it came to be deposited in the vast molecular cloud known as M 42, the Orion Nebula. M42 is visible to the naked eye. The brilliant tensegrity array of stars in the depths of the nebula, the Trapezium, is the exact locale where the Anthropic plasm is deposited.
Trapezium formation: alignment 23 Gemini
Your origins are in heaven alone. Innately, you know this.
TAD
Plasmic electrical filaments (akasha) spreading throughout intergalactic space and within the galactic arms provide currents that carry propagules of the genomic plasm to various hospitable planetary systems where the genome can seed and sprout. What emerges is not the Anthropos but only a racial strain of it. Humanity only exists in racial strains. There never stands before you any pure embodiment of the Anthropos, generic humanity. Think of raw milk. Imagine that you never had access to raw milk, but only homogenized milk, pasteurized milk, or flavored milk, like chocolate milk or strawberry milk, or a banana milk shake! A banana milk shake made with pasteurized milk is not raw milk. It is derivative. Every human being is a derivative of the generic human substance, the species, and no one is a pure and singular embodiment of that species.
You are a derivative of the human species, appearing in a racial strain. No one embodies, or can embody, the gennomic root identity itself. The concept of humanity embodied in individual members of the human species is an error, at best. At worst, it is a hateful deceit.
But what, doesn’t Gnosticism assert the spark of divinity in each person? Absolutely not. I have taken great effort to make it clear that the divinity in you is not entitative but facultative. Each human animal possesses a spark of nous, divine intelligence, but the spark is not alive in every case, not active. Think of a spark plug. It can be active or it can be dead, useless. The spark of nous inherent to each human animal can be alive, but it is not necessarily so. In plain common sense terms, some people are not able to act on the intelligence given to them.
Call people TADs: a tertiary anthropic derivative. Look at the tad over there. The first status of the Anthropos is within the Pleroma, the second status, in the Orion Nebula, and the third or tertiary status is what you are, what everyone is.
Definitions of derivative: something which is based on another source.”The aircraft is a derivative of the Falcon 20GR.” A word derived from another or from a root in the same or another language. A substance that is derived chemically from a specified compound. “Laudanum is a derivative of opium.”
Races are derivatives of the Anthropos. You are a racial derivative of humanity, the species. You are not humanity embodied and do not stand for it. Racial humanism with its fundamental recognition of racial differences is the panacea, the cure of all social ills. It asserts that you ever see generic humanity except through an individual racial filter.
Human Dignity
The spark of intelligence is the spark of divinity. But the divine experiment depends on how this spark comes alive, seeks expression, and activates behaviour. Recognition goes to the spark when it proves to be active and productive. To assume “the dignity and worth of every person” in the absence of any proof that the divine spark is active and productive, is insane. No one, no TAD, has innate dignity and worth merely by the fact of holding the status of a human person. To assert such a proposition, you must disregard the purpose of the divine experiment with the human species.
I realize that this is a hard truth to accept, and will certainly be deemed totally objectionable to many minds. I am positing a concept of humanity that will be deeply offensive to the assumed sense of humanity, the universalist view held by many people, including Nancy Pelosi.
Even if you do not believe in the divine experiment, and do not follow that concept or meme, it remains to question the value of giving respect to those who have not earned it. The status of dignity and worth has to be earned and proven. To grant it categorically in a grand gesture of inclusive humanity directed toward any and all tads — a gesture, by the way, which in turn confirms the humanity of the one who grants it to others: virtue-signalling — is an act that subverts the true value of dignity and worth where they are earned. Those tads, those people, who truly merit that recognition of humaneness come to stand on the same level of those who do not merit it, and have done nothing to merit it. This leveling of human worthiness is of course the basic objective of Marxism communism. And it is the high moral ground of the Christian faith.
Look carefully at this citation:
The belief that what I have called the spiritual presence in and behind the universe was concentrated in a single transcendent humanlike god, involved the further belief that nothing else in the universe is divine… God placed the whole of his nonhuman creation at the disposal of his human creatures to exploit in any way they might choose… The salutary respect and awe with which man had originally regarded his environment was thus dispelled by Judaic monotheism in the versions of its Israelite originators, and of Christians and Muslims… Communism is an outcome of Christianity… I diagnose Communism as a religion, and specifically as a new representative of the Judaic species, in which the Judaic mythology has been preserved.
– Arnold Toynbee and Daisaku Ikeda, Choose Life.
A lot could be made of this cogent passage. I select the term “salutary respect” which I parse in this way: respect that comes from a sane and healthy outlook and in turn engenders it. I would even say, a eugenic outlook. It is eugenically unsound and nonsensical to grant full respect for humanity to those who cannot meet even the elementary standards of humanitas, such as honesty, honor, respect for the boundaries of others. To be born as a human does not insure that someone can act in a humane manner, or exhibit the basic qualities of humanitas, the moral standard. In fact, many living today cannot.
The argument here is both brutal and simple. Just consider respect of any kind. Do you in your personal affairs respect people who don’t earn your respect, and who may envy and hate you, showing in their turn no respect or gratitude toward you? The Christian ethic says you should: “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you” (Matthew 5:44). Jesus advises or, perhaps, commands that you do so. Communism demands that you level yourself to the lowest common denominator of generic humanity, including the status of poverty (also a Christian ideal), lack of personal agency, and deprivation of material and creative opportunity. All this in the cause of liberation of the masses, the proletariat, the faceless mob. Communism is indeed an outcome, outgrowth, or perverse transmogrification of Judaic morals specifically designed to subdue the nations, the Goyim.
The appeal to humanity subverts and perverts the discovery and development of true human gifts and talents. It is natural to respect what is gifted, exceptional, and inspiring, both in nature and in human achievement: El Capitan at Yosemite and Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov. It is unnatural and perverse to respect that which is ugly, demeaning, inferior, unproductive, devoid of moral sanity and beauty. Yet Nancy Pelosi champions the dignity and worth of M13 gangs who butcher teenage girls alive with machetes. Doing so, of course, she totally disregards the dignity and worth of the murdered and tortured girls. Not a word on that issue.
Imagine respecting arrivals from alien countries and cultures who hate the native people whose boundaries they cross without being invited, and show no gratitude for being received. Does that make sense? Would you act that way in a situation where the boundaries of your home were concerned, or even the boundaries of the car you drive?
By another spin, consider the respect granted to someone who joins you on a wilderness trek, or a rock-climbing adventure. Would you respect the newcomer in total absence of any proof that he or she has competence, skill, respect for the environment, regard for dangers…? Of course not. But if the issue of respect plays so critically in even these small and practical circumstances, at what scale does respect come into play in recognition of the generic identity of the human species?
Trapezium: ecliptic alignment (theta Orionis) = 23 Gemini ECL 83
That is the cosmic scale, going right out to M 42. There is where you look to picture humanity, the Anthropos. Citing again from the DWW on the Jupiter loop currently in progress:
I can now identify the theme of struggle against universality — call it “the resistance” or the Great Dissent. I detect in my mindstream the Jupiterian teaching of Thelete who guides Correction in complement to his consort Sophia: racial humanism versus universal humanity. The latter is the gift of the Jewish people. Some gift.
The Anthropos is purely imaginal, extra-biological. Races are existential, biologically real.
The true ideal of humanity would be seen in the imaginal presence of the Anthropos in the Orion Nebula, not in some abstract ideal dictated by an alien parasitic in-group which excludes all the rest of the human races as out-groups. What a formula for insanity. What could go wrong from taking your sense of humanity from an in-group who regards you as a subhuman animal to be dominated and enslaved?
In PT, you have the opportunity to view humanity/the species imaginally: as if it were a fictional entity or a fabulous mythological creature, like a unicorn. It is only a mythic fiction, but a singular and incomparable mythic fiction. You never see an incarnate specimen of humanity standing before you. You only see a tad, a racial derivative of the primary genomic plasm.
La Pieta of Michelangelo: typical example, known world-wide, that encourages people of all nations to picture the essence of humanness in the unique person of Jesus, the human/divine hybrid, or invest their sense of humanity in this person, celebrated as a corpse, a victim of torture.
Yet, you also define and uphold certain standards of humanitas, the moral and mental-emotional standard, the eugenic standard. Humanitas is not a biological condition, not a generic-genomic property of the tad, but a set of values to be discovered and demonstrated through the right actions. There are no human rights inherent to a biological specimen derived from the Anthropine genome. Rights are only agreements made between people. They are not innate or god-given or goddess-given in any way. To claim so is a hateful deceit intended to subvert and destroy the innate sense of responsibility upon which human morality is based. Part of this deceit is accomplished through the shell game of attributing rights to a trans-human agency, rather than admitting that they are merely constructs of the human mind. The peanut is deceptively presented as beneath one of three shells — Monotheism, Deism, Theism — but actually it is tucked into the hand of the trickster running the game.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Unfortunately, the primacy syntax of the Declaration of Independence is flawed. The assertion made is not intellectually viable; it cannot stand up to critical scrutiny. It is profoundly misleading. The Founding Fathers toggled erratically between the Deist spin, belief in a supreme deity who does not intervene in human affairs, and the Theist spin, belief in a supreme deity who in some manner intervenes and takes a hand in human affairs — for example, by assigning rights. But the claim that the Creator endows humans with rights is a plain deceit: humans define rights and attribute them to a trans-human agency.
It is not true, either that all men are created equal, or that they are endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights. And politicians know it. They perpetuate the hateful deceit by enforcing the lie to the public while acting in total disregard of human rights. The Xenosh, inarguably the in-group who most vociferously champion human rights today, are also distinguished by their blatant violation of human rights. They don’t fall for the hateful deceit they perpetrate on the nations, all other races apart from themselves, the ubervolk.
Ethical and political refutation of the erroneous notion of human rights certainly needs close attention as Correction unfolds. But just as critically, the Great Dissent challenges the corollary notion of universality.
“Our program replaces the liberal idea of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity with the people, the people defined by its blood and rooted in it soil. This may be a simple and concise sentence, but its consequences are colossal.”
– Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, cited in The Law of Blood: Thinking and Acting as a Nazi by Johann Chapoutot, Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2018
The people, the tads, are racial derivatives of the Anthropine genomic plasma. All people. Yet the generic appeal to all people and its attendant program of universal human rights misses the mark: it does not address human identity but superposes a deceptive fiction. One might ask, how can I call the Anthropos a mythic fiction and then turn around and condemn the Judaic concept of universality humanity as likewise a fiction? Well, one fiction is true and provable and the other is a hateful deceit. One fiction is a challenge of imagination and the other is an outright lie. Therein lies the test: to see the difference.
It may be that I am overstating the case here, or perhaps not. The Great Dissent against the dogma of universality in all its forms is a challenge that stands at the heart of Correction. Take it to heart, reflect carefully on it, and stand for it in the world if that is your sovereign choice, however and whenever you can.
– jll summer solstice 2019 Galicia
___________________
Note: The Hymn of the Pearl
The Hymn of the Pearl (also Hymn of the Soul, Hymn of the Robe of Glory or Hymn of Judas Thomas the Apostle) is a section in the apocryphal Acts of Thomas, not to be confused with the Gospel of Thomas in the NHC, the Gnostic Codices. It is written in Syriac in the form of a hymn the Apostle Thomas sings while praying for himself and other prisoners. Religious scholars regards this work as presenting a Gnostic view of the human condition, routinely described as the plight of immaterial spirits lost in a world of matter and forgetful of their true origin. In Christian faith, Jesus the offspring, messiah, and messenger of God comes to remedy this situation by performing an act of self-sacrifice.