Lisa Harrison Interview December 2014
Part One
NOTE: Timecode for interview, not my recorded commentary.
Consider how the Biblical creation story works just as a story, based on the plot factors, the logic of development. Any comparable story made up out of thin air would be dismissed as absurd out of hand, totally ridiculous, not worthy of credence. The Biblical creation myth persists due to the tendency of the human mind to self-validate within the narrative it adopts, when that narrative supports some notion about the self.
It could be argued, by way of objection, that the FGS is also self-validating: it prompts questions and then answers the questions it raises (as I assert). Well, yes, but if you compare the Q & A development (as I call it) within the FGS to the self-validation of the Biblical creation myth, you see many differences–the main one being that the legitimation and rationalization of the Biblical story always attributes omnipotent and omniscient powers to the deity. Such a definition of deity as authority above and beyond the human dimension is the mark of patriarchy. This claim is simply a pretext for bearded men to exert authority over human society, insisting that they cannot be questioned–what theocrats say of the creator god confers that power on them. Hence they say god is that way, behaving in that manner, simply to serve their purposes.
The human mind will defy its own reasoning powers and strain itself to the verge of insanity to accept the premise of omnipotence/omniscience demonstrated by an inaccessible, off-planet deity. Every single person who adopts beliefs in that kind of god acquires something from it, a payoff: release from responsibility for moral determinations. If the source of morals is off-planet and extra-human, there is no need for human animals to take responsibility for issues of morality, intention, choice, etc.
With the FGS, by contrast, the plot development is wholly logical and reasonable, although amply charged with surprise and suspense. Participation in the FGS depends strongly on empathy for the main character, Sophia. But it is impossible to feel empathy for the male creator god of the Bible. To do so is to bond with the perpetrator who uses the pretence of deity against believers. This ploy of mind-control, originating from the archontic parasites, is extremely destructive to humanity.
I take the rule or standard for the genuine and veracious Q & A development of the FGS, by which you reason out correct answers from the questions prompted by the narrative, from the German lawyer who defended Ernst Zundel; Sylvia Stolz cites Johann Gottfried von Herder in her “Banned Speech, Banned Evidence, and Banned Legal Defense Speech – The Reality of Free Speech”:
To think what is true, to sense what is beautiful, and to want what is good–thereby the spirit finds the purpose of a life in reason.
m 15: Hubble discovers that the solar system is located in a galaxy with a view to another “island universe”, M31.
m 18:40: “astrological data” – astronomical data.
Saptaparna (The Secret Doctrine): Note the terms Sige and Bythos cited by Madame Blavatsky are names of Aeons from the Gnostic theology she learned from G. R. S. Mead, the pre-eminent Gnostic scholar prior to the NHL find.
m 23: Tree Nymphs and Tree-Hung Shamans Pt.II: The Chthonian Romance is my addition to the narrative.
m 26: nine previous experiments with the Anthropic plasm : correlated to the ten Avatars of Vishnu. Here I make a “patch” or “graft” blending the Sophianic materials with elements of a mythic narrative from another culture. Scholars assert that Vishnu dreams the many worlds. Likewise, Sophia from her vantage point in the Pleroma observed the dreaming of previous worlds where the anthropic plasm emerged.
m 30: “The anthropos can’t handle its own power.” Compare: “The human species is divinely designed to excel in violence.”
Riddle of Violence Pt. 1:
m 32: trimorphic protennoia: found in the Nag Hammadi Library
m 34: Greek anamou, anomaly, aberration, exception from norm
m 43: plasmic discharge
m 45: acari insect experiment by Andrew Crosse – Abiogenesis of Acari, 1837.
m 56:30: “among the Navajos” (I meant “among the Navajo”, no ‘s’)
m 1:04:00: envy, violation of boundaries by Archons, enacted by human animals in their service. November 2014 the USSA president, Obama, cites Rabbinical scripture in a speech addressing the illegal immigrants in the US, giving them a free pass to remain, all reinforced by a Jewish agent pushing the mass immigration agenda of JAWS (Jewish anti-white supremacy), Rabbi David Saperstein. I can only feel outrage at the pseudo-black president wagging his finger piously and citing Jewish scripture, but what Saperstein says is even worse: A Jew calls for non-Jewish Goyim to provide Mexican and Latino illegals with a way of life as good as the Jews have!! WTF? Of course, it is not the Jews who are going to provide this life, it is the Goyim. Thus Jews dictate to Goyim what they have to do in allowing white culture to be destroyed by mass immigration from Mexico and Latin America. Oh happy day. Where would the Goyim be without Jews to guide them?
m 1:21:00: Jupiter’s “yellow stripe” – red spot. Including the diminution of the red spot, many other changes in the visual and physical properties of the archontic planetary clockworks have been observed during the three years of reset, and continue.
… Finally!!! Getting to the two pertinent passages in the NHL, including a reference to Correction as noted in “Myth In Progress”, upgrading the Fallen Goddess Scenario.
Let’s note once again how the central riddle of correction generates a series of questions that prompt human imagination in the direction where answers to those questions can be found. With each prompt leading to new insight and improved recall of our remote past on this planet, we achieve another degree of participation with the Wisdom Goddess. For instance, the riddle generates this question:
In her Pleromic (pre-plunge) Dreaming of the experiment with Anthropos-10, when Sophia previewed her intervention, did she conceive it to be independent of human participation or reliant upon it? In other words, do the anomalous conditions of the experiment after her plunge change the dynamics of her intervention, involving human collaboration in a way that would not otherwise have applied, and if so, how so?
Well, the myth itself already answers this question in one respect. In Episode 6, FGS 1.0 follows the surviving textual sources relating how the Aeon Sophia, acting outside the Pleroma, modified the original calibration of the Anthropos by infusing it with the luminous epinoia for the specific purpose of providing a faculty to be used to defeat the Archons:
When Pistis saw the impiety of the chief ruler she was filled with anger. She was invisible. She said, “you are mistaken, Samael,” that is “blind god.” “there is an immortal man of light who has been in existence before you and who will appear among your modeled forms; he will trample you to scorn just as potter’s clay is pounded. And you will descent to your mother, the abyss, along with those who belong to you. For at the consummation of your works the entire defect that has become visible out of the truth will be abolished, and it will cease to be and will be like what has never been. Saying this, Pistis revealed the likeness of her greatness in the waters. And so doing she withdrew up to her light.
– On the Origin of the World, passage 103 NHLE, ed. Robinson.
Read the above passage alongside with this one from a different text:
And the luminous epinoia [the power of imagination] was hidden in Adam [the human genome], in order that the Archons [mind parasites] might not reach that power, but that the epinoia might assist the correction [or, might be a correction] of the deprivation [defect] of Sophia [i.e., her separation from the Pleroma].
– The Apocryphon of John, 20.25
Putting these two passages together is like fitting two parts of a partially solved jigsaw puzzle together. For example, the puzzle shows an idyllic pond and a landing, a small pier, with trees reflected in the pond. But you do not “get the picture” until you lock together two chunky sets of already combined pieces. Can you visualize how that happens? Joining the two chunky sections with two key pieces that lock together, you suddenly see — “Ah, there is a landing on the pond, and trees reflected in the water beside it.”
Here, extracted from the Coptic texts, are the two chunky pieces cited above with the key terms underlined:
“immortal man of light” :: Coptic OUN OURHOME NATHANATOS RRMOUOEIN
“luminous epinoia” :: Coptic AHO TEPINOIA MPOUOEIN HN ADAM
I have scribbled borders around the citations to give a puzzle-like effect, showing by arrows where they interlock. In the lower citation you can easily make out the word EPINIOA. The prefix T is the definite article, the. The Coptic word for light or luminous is odd-looking: OYOEIN. The Y-shaped letter, pronounced he, is equivalent to a U in transliteration. At the end of the underlined passage you can make out the name ADAM with the textual notation 26 between the A and D. ADAM is a codeword for the Anthropic plasm.
No scholar today knows how the letters in this script were actually pronounced.
jll December 25-26, 2014 Andalucia